| |
Assessing progress toward a culture of peace at the local level | A Strategy for the Global Movement for a Culture of Peace |
|
World Peace through the Town Hall 1) The difference between "peace" and "culture of peace" and a brief history of the culture of war 2) The role of the individual in culture of war and culture of peace 3) Why the nation-state cannot create a culture of peace 4) The important role of civil society in creating a culture of peace --Peace and disarmament movements --International understanding, tolerance and solidarity --Movements for free flow of information --The strengths and weaknesses of civil society 5) The basic and essential role of local government in culture of peace --Transparency and the free flow of information --Education for a culture of peace 6) Assessing progress toward a culture of peace at the local level
--Inter-relationships among the various measures
--Culture of peace measurement at the level of the state 7) Going global: networking of city culture of peace commissions |
Specific indicators have been used by cities to measure each of the programme areas of a culture of peace. Here are some examples. Sustainable development. The questionnaire of ICLEI (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives) addresses many issues that can be used as the basis for indicators of sustainable development. Here are some of the highlights : * Is there a municipal council decision for a local sustainable development process or plan, and, if so, what resources have been made available (dedicated staff, time from other staff, budget allocation, in-kind support) and over what time period? Human rights. As mentioned earlier, the City of São Paulo (2008) has measured human rights in the 31 sub-prefectures of that city for the years 2004, 2005 and 2006. General socio-economic indicators included income levels, sewer access, literacy, housing, employment and infant mortality. Violence indicators included homicide, assault and deaths by police action. Indicators for children and youth included levels of education, hospitalization for acute respiratory infection, illegal acts and institutionalization for aggression. Indicators for women included comparisons with men for level of unemployment and income, votes for female candidates for city council, and rates of abortion, teenage pregnancy, death in childbirth, and access to prenatal care. Indicators for Blacks were, for the most part, similar to those for women: comparisons with whites for level of unemployment and income, rates of teenage pregnancy and access to prenatal care, as well as a comparison of homicide rates of Blacks and whites. The maps of São Paulo, according to the human rights measures, provide a remarkable picture of the progress towards human rights in that city. Over the three years measured, there has been a measurable progress: in 2004 only three subprefectures had high levels of human rights while six were precarious. By 2006, the situation had reversed and seven had high levels while only two were precarious. The São Paulo data have policy implications. They identify the neighborhoods where the city needs to concentrate its efforts regarding each of the various aspects of human rights. In this regard, each subprefecture has its strong points and its weak points. No subprefecture has a high rating in all five components. For example, while Aricanduva, Vila Mariana, Pinheiros, Sé, Lapa, Butantá and Santana/Tucuruvi are high in the socioeconomic rights, they are all low on the dimension of Negro rights, where instead the highest scores are those of Campo Limpo, Cap.Socorro, Cidade Ademar, Cidade Tiradentes, Guaianases, M'Boi Mirim and São Mateus. Democratic participation. The International Observatory on Participatory Democracy (2006) has produced a methodology for evaluating participatory democracy which is available on the Internet. In addition to participatory budgeting, it provides suggestions for the evaluation of other municipal processes such as the preparation of strategic municipal plans, local economic development, sustainability, and education projects. Although it does not provide specific quantitative indicators, the OIDP methodology does provide general principles for evaluation of specific initiatives and processes, which include the following: consensus, initiative and leadership; integration in the municipal system, clarity of objectives, planning and resources, number and diversity of participants in initiatives, openness of the process, relevance to people's lives, level of participation including capacity to make proposals, quality of information provided, results implementation and feedback, improvement of relationships among participants, and training. For details, see their website (International Observatory on Participatory Democracy, 2006). Women's equality. A specific list of indicators for women's equality has been published by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, as mentioned earlier. Here are some of the gender-specific items. The full list is available on the Internet (Federation of Canadian Municipalities, 2004). Affirmative action policies in municipal political parties and parity in committees, commissions and para-municipal enterprises
Tolerance and solidarity. Faced with serious problems of tensions between different populations, including minorities and immigrants, the Council of Europe has undertaken the task of measuring social cohesion with an extensive array of questions and indicators. The list of questions is too long to summarize here. Even if one combines the separate sections for minorities and immigrants, there remain over 200 questions, most of which concern differences in the conditions of life between these groups and the general population. For details, see Council of Europe (2005).
Transparency. The Spanish organization, Transparency International España has taken the lead in evaluating transparency at the municipal level. Their publication, "Indice de Transparencia de los Ayuntamientos 2008," measures transparency in 100 Spanish municipalities.
|
The History of the Culture of War What is culture and how does it evolve Warfare in prehistory and its usefulness The culture of war in prehistory Data from prehistory before the Neolithic Enemy images: culture or biology War and the culture of war at the dawn of history --Ancient Central American civilization Warfare and the origin of the State Religion and the origin of the State A summary of the culture of war at the dawn of history The internal culture of war: a taboo topic --2.External conquest and exploitation: Colonialism and Neocolonialism --3.The internal culture of war and economies based on exploitation of workers and the environment --5.The military-industrial complex --9.Identification of an "enemy" --10.Education for the culture of war --12.Religion and the culture of war --13.The arts and the culture of war |