A Statistical Analysis of the Social Behavior of the Male Stumptail Macaque (Macaca arctoides) Table II: Association of Facio-Vocal Activity with Acts and Postures Page 21

Observed/expected frequencies (c)
Overall O/E (a) Behaviors (b) dominant
(vs.sub.)
dominant
(vs.dom.)
subordinate
Offense, defense, and submission (d)
76.9
66.7
44.4
30.8
28.5
27.8
21.7
11.5
10.1
Scrm + Crch
Fc31 + Lnge
Fc31 + HtNC
Fc13 + RnAw
Fc23/33 + Crch
Scrm + RnAw
Fc13 + RstR
Pant + RnAw
Fc23/33 + RnAw
0/.000
1/.006
0/.006
0/.020
0/.000
0/.000
2/.122
0/.028
1/.031
0/.000
3/.073
0/.000
0/.086
0/.000
0/.013
5/.157
1/.116
1/.311
6/.191
1/.018
4/.092
10/.290  
7/.292
7/.403
0/.000
4/.290
6/.617
Sexual behavior
18.0  
11.5  
10.3  
  9.16
  8.71
  5.26
  4.88
  3.99
  3.98
  3.49
  3.21
  3.02
  2.80
Pant + Auto
FcTC + Mont
FcLS + Auto
Fc3X + Auto
FcLS + Mont
Exhl + Mstb
FcLS + Mstb
FcLS + Prst
Fc21 + Mstb
FcTC + Prst
FcTC + Mstb
Pant + Prst
Fc23/33 + Prst
0/.049
14/.602  
2/.111
1/.089
6/.557
5/.143
4/.239
6/1.26
3/.420
5/1.36
2/.258
2/.553
3/.603
4/.458
13/2.23  
8/1.29
5/.987
15/3.14  
2/2.66
10/6.27  
22/5.47  
2/1.37
9/3.89
4/4.47
6/1.95
7/3.52
3/.044
0/.204
0/.101
2/.113
6/.298
3/.303
8/.927
5/2.48
5/.412
8/1.70
5/.636
2/1.10
7/2.43
Display
  9.94
  5.13
Bark + RBnce
Bark + Ptrl
7/1.14
5/1.43
10/1.41  
1/.315
0/.013
2/.059
Grooming
  6.72 Chmp + SGrm 0/.000 8/1.07 0/.000
Other behaviors
  2.15
  2.00
Fc4X + Sit
Coo + Sit
25/11.4  
9/3.68
5/2.63
0/.000
12/5.22
14/8.70

(a) Ratio of observed to expected frequencies derived from a 2 X 2 contingency table including the two behaviors (facio-vocal activity and act or posture) and the total number of possible combinations over all animals in the study.

(b) Associations of facio-vocal activity and acts or postures. All such associations are listed that were significantly nonrandom for all pairings of animals at the 0.001 level of probability according to a Chi square or Fisher's exact probability test. See Table 1 for abbreviations.

(c) Observed frequency followed by frequency expected from calculations based on a 2 X 2 contingency table (see text).

(d) Approximate behavior categories.

(e) Calculation of the association of bark with repeated bouncing was done in terms of the occurrence in the same minute of testing rather than in the same behavioral event.

previous page
title page
next page